Eight Misconceptions About El Niño (and La Niña)     Posted by Francesco Fiondella on June 30, 2014
     For years, people have been pointing to El Niño as the culprit  behind floods, droughts, famines, economic failures, and record-breaking  global heat. Can a single climate phenomenon really cause all these  events? Is the world just a step away from disaster when El Niño  conditions develop? What exactly is this important climate phenomenon  and why should society care about it? Who will be most affected? We  address these questions as well as clear up some common misconceptions  about El Niño, La Niña, and everything in between!
 First, the basics. El Niño refers to the occasional warming of the  eastern and central Pacific Ocean around the equator (see image below).  The warmer water tends to get only 1 to 3 degrees Celsius above the  average sea-surface temperatures for that area, although in the very  strong El Niño of 1997-98, it reached 5 degrees or more above average in  some locations. La Niña is the climate counterpart to El Niño– a 
yin to its 
yang, so to speak. A La Niña is defined by 
cooler-than-normal  sea-surface temperatures across much of the equatorial eastern and  central Pacific. El Niño and La Niña episodes each tend to last roughly a  year, although occasionally they may last 18 months or longer.
 
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
		
		
	
	
These  global maps centered on the Pacific Ocean show patterns of sea surface  temperature during El Niño and La Niña episodes. The colors along the  equator show areas that are warmer or cooler than the long-term average.  Image courtesy of Climate.gov
 The Pacific is the largest ocean on the planet, so a significant  change in its normal pattern of surface temperatures would lead to  corresponding changes in atmospheric winds. This can have consequences  for temperature, rainfall and vegetation in faraway places. In normal  years, trade winds push warm water—and its associated heavier  rainfall—westward toward Indonesia. The warmer waters in the west and  relatively colder waters in the east Pacific reinforce the pattern and  strength of the trade winds. But during an El Niño, which occurs on  average once every three-to-five years, the winds peter out and can even  reverse direction, bringing the rains toward South America instead.  This is why we typically associate El Niño with drought in Indonesia and  Australia and flooding in Peru. We have observed enough El Niño events  by now that we know these changing climate conditions, combined with  other factors, can have serious impacts on society, such as reduced crop  harvests, wildfires, or loss of life and property in floods. There is  also evidence that the regional climate anomalies associated with El  Niño conditions increase the risk of certain vector-borne diseases, such  as malaria, in places where they don’t occur every year and where  disease control is limited.
 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
	
	
		
	 
El Niño sometimes brings drought to Africa’s Sahel.
 However, while we may expect certain climate impacts in certain  regions during an El Niño event, there is still a possibility that other  aspects of the climate system in a particular year may work to  offset  the influence of El Niño. During either an El Niño or a La Niña, we also  observe changes in atmospheric pressure, wind and rainfall patterns in  different parts of the Pacific, and beyond. An El Niño is associated  with high pressure in the western Pacific, whereas a La Niña is  associated with high pressure in the eastern Pacific. The ‘see-sawing’  of high pressure that occurs as conditions move from El Niño to La Niña  is known as the 
Southern Oscillation. The oft-used term 
El Niño-Southern Oscillation,  or ENSO, reminds us that El Niño and La Niña episodes reflect changes  not just to the ocean, but to the atmosphere as well. For more details  on ENSO, please visit the International Research Institute for Climate  and Society’s 
official ENSO page.
 ENSO is one of the main sources of year-to-year variability in  weather and climate on Earth and has significant socioeconomic  implications for many regions around the world. The developing El Niño  conditions in recent months offers an opportunity to clear up some  common misconceptions about the climate phenomenon:
 [h=3]1. Do El Niño periods cause more disasters than normal periods? On a worldwide basis, this isn’t necessarily the case. But ENSO  conditions do allow climate scientists to produce more accurate seasonal  forecasts and help them better predict extreme drought or rainfall in  several regions around the globe. (Read a 2005 paper on the topic 
here.)  On a regional level, however, we’ve seen that El Niño and La Niña exert  fairly consistent influences on the climate of some regions. For  example, El Niño conditions typically cause more rain to fall in Peru,  and less rain to fall in Indonesia and Southern Africa. These  conditions, combined with socioeconomic factors, can make a country or  region more vulnerable to impacts. On the other hand, because El Niño  enhances our ability to predict the climate conditions expected in these  same regions, one can take advantage of that improved predictability to  help societies improve preparedness, issue early warnings and reduce  possible negative impacts.
 
	
This  set of interactive maps from IRI’s Data Library shows the historical  tendency of El Niño and La Niña to affect seasonal precipitation around  the world.
 [h=3]2. Do El Niño and La Niña significantly affect climate in most regions of the globe? They significantly affect only about 25% of the world’s land surface  during any particular season, and less than 50% of land surface during  the entire time that ENSO conditions persist.
 [h=3]3. Do regions affected by El Niño and La Niña see impacts for the entire 8-12 months that the climate conditions last? No. Most regions will only see impacts during one specific season,  which may start months after the ENSO event first develops. For example,  the current El Niño may cause the southern U.S. to get  wetter-than-normal conditions in the December to March season, but  Kenyans may see wetter-than-normal conditions between October and  December.
 
	
Walter Baethgen discusses the ‘winners and losers’ in agriculture during El Niño
 [h=3]4. Do El Niño episodes lead to adverse impacts only? Fires in southeast Asia, droughts in eastern Australia, flooding in  Peru often accompany El Niño events. Much of the media coverage on El  Niño has focused on the more extreme and negative consequences typically  associated with the phenomenon. To be sure, the impacts can wreak havoc  in some developing and developed countries alike, but El Niño events  are also associated with reduced frequency of Atlantic hurricanes,  warmer winter temperatures in northern half of U.S., which reduce  heating costs, and plentiful spring/summer rainfall in southeastern  Brazil, central Argentina and Uruguay, which leads to above-average  summer crop yields.
 [h=3]5. Should we worry more during El Niño episodes than La Niña episodes? Not necessarily. They each come with their own set of features and  risks. In general, El Niño is associated with increased likelihood of  drought throughout much of the tropical land areas, whereas La Niña is  associated with increased risk of drought throughout much of the  mid-latitudes (see maps 
here and 
here.)  El Niño may have gained more attention in the scientific community, and  thus the public, because it substantially alters the temperature and  circulation patterns in the tropical Pacific. La Niña, on the other  hand, tends to amplify normal conditions in that part of the world: the  relatively cold temperatures in the eastern equatorial Pacific become  colder, the relatively warm temperatures become even warmer, and the  low-level winds blowing from east to west along the equatorial Pacific  strengthen.
 [h=3]6. The stronger the El Niño/La Niña, the stronger the impacts, and vice versa, right? 
Current forecasts show  that a weak-to-moderate El Niño is likely to develop by mid-autumn  2014. Does this mean we should expect weak-to-moderate impacts? Not  necessarily. The important point to remember is that ENSO shifts the  odds of some regions receiving less or more rainfall than they usually  do, but it doesn’t guarantee this will happen. For example, scientists  expected the very strong El Niño of 1997/98–which triggered wildfires in  Indonesia and flooding and crop loss in Kenya – to also increase the  chances of below-normal summer rainfall in India and South Africa, but  this didn’t happen. On the other hand, India did experience strong  rainfall deficiencies during a much weaker El Niño in 2002, and severe  drought during the moderate El Niño of 2009-2010. So, while there is a  slight tendency for stronger El Nino/La Niña events to have stronger  impacts, many exceptions may be expected.
 [h=3]7. Are El Niño and La Niña events directly responsible for specific storms or other weather events? We usually can’t pin a single event on an El Niño or La Niña, just  like we can’t blame global climate changes for any single hurricane.  ENSO events typically affect the frequency or strength of weather  events–for example. when looked at over the course of a season, regions  experience increased or decreased rainfall.
 [h=3]8. Are El Niño and La Niña closely related to global warming? El Niño and La Niña are a normal part of the earth’s climate and have  likely been occurring for millions of years. Global climate change may  affect the characteristics of El Niño and La Niña events, but the  research is still ongoing.
 
Thanks to Lisa Goddard and Anthony Barnston for lending their expertise and for reviewing this article.