Climate & Conflict: Warmer World May be More Violent  					
-  							Published: August 1st, 2013 							, Last Updated: August 1st, 2013
 
								By 
Andrew Freedman 							
 							Follow @afreedma						
 					 					  					 					 						 							 						 							 						 							 						 							 										  						  						  						  						  						 							 	Global warming may be ratcheting up the odds for violence at the local,  regional, and international scales, from inner-city America to the arid  plains of Africa, according to a 
comprehensive new study published Thursday.
  	The study, published in the journal Science, concludes that climate  events from heat waves to droughts and floods have strong links to  violent conflicts, helping to explain patterns of crime, civil wars, and  even the collapse of some ancient civilizations. The study draws on a  broad body of evidence from fields as disparate as archaeology and  political science that show a causal and often substantial connection  between climate and those events.
  	 								 																			
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
	
	
 																		A Sudanese woman and children are pictured in Fanga Suk in East Jebel Marra, South Darfur. 
	Credit: United Nations Photo by Olivier Chassot. 								 							
  	The report, which took a sweeping view of 60 previously published  studies on climate and conflict, found that the size of climate’s  influence on conflict is larger than most previous studies had  estimated, although the authors cautioned that climate is not  necessarily the biggest factor driving violence in most situations.
  	Written by researchers at Princeton University and the University of  California at Berkeley, the study found that when the climate deviates  far from average conditions, the risk of many types of conflict  increases.
  	“The central finding of the study is the link — the very strong link  —  we find between adverse climate and more violence, more human  conflict,” said co-author Edward Miguel, of U.C. Berkeley, in an  interview. “We establish that link looking at a much broader set of  studies than others have before.”
  	To put it more technically, the study found that for each one standard  deviation change in the climate toward warmer average temperatures or  more extreme rainfall, the median estimate of the frequency of  intergroup conflict — i.e. civil war — rises by 14 percent, while the  frequency of interpersonal conflict increases by 4 percent.
  	“For a sense of scale, this kind of temperature change is roughly equal  to warming an African country by 0.6°F for an entire year, or warming a  U.S. county by 5°F for a given month. These are moderate changes, but  they have a sizable impact on societies,” said study co-author Marshall  Burke of U.C. Berkeley, in a press release.
  	Given that 
climate projections  show that many parts of the world are expected to at least double that  amount of warming by 2050, the findings strongly suggest that barring  other mitigating factors, a warmer world will also be a more violent  one.
  	 								 									  										
 																			
	 
 									  										 																		Zambian peacekeepers from the United Nations Mission  in Sudan (UNMIS) patrol streets lined with looted items awaiting  collection in Abyei, the main town of the disputed Abyei area on the  border of Sudan and newly independent South Sudan.
	Credit: United Nations Photo by Stuart Price. 								 							
  	There are numerous recent conflicts that studies have linked to climate extremes, including the 
Arab Spring that began two years ago, 
genocide in Darfur, and the ongoing 
Syrian civil war.
  	In the case of Syria, for example, a 
major drought and sharp spike in food prices,  along with reduced access to water and power supplies preceded the  uprising against the regime of president Bashar Al-Assad, and similar 
climate-related food price spikes played out in Egypt and Tunisia prior to the ouster of longtime governments in those countries.
  	Lack of consistent access to water may contribute to more conflicts in  the future, with increasingly strained water resources in coming decades  due to burgeoning populations and drought. Climate studies show that 
drought is projected to increase in frequency and severity in some parts of the world that are experiencing high rates of population growth, such as the Middle East and parts of Africa.
  	The research is the first to reexamine the available evidence on  climate and conflict, which has at times been a contentious subject  within the scientific community.
  	The results dramatically depart from prior research that said the  relationship between global warming and conflict is contradictory and  inconclusive. The Cal-Berkeley team found that all 27 studies dealing  with modern societies found a relationship between higher temperatures  and greater violence.
  	Experts in the field who were not involved in the study said its findings are groundbreaking.
  	“I think it’s a path-breaking study that lays to rest a lot of the  earlier, slightly misinformed, debate and confusion,” said Marc Levy,  deputy director of the 
International Earth Science Information Network at Columbia University.
  	Levy said the study shows that climate is clearly a driver of violence,  but not the main driver in most cases, given the many other  contributing factors to conflict, from ethnic rivalries to economic  development and political repression. He said previous studies that had  looked at individual conflicts and individual climate factors resulted  in a “cacophony” of seemingly disparate results.
  	 								 									  										
 																			
	 
 									  										 																		These four maps illustrate the increased potential for  future drought worldwide over the decades indicated, based on current  projections of future greenhouse gas emissions. The maps use a common  measure, the Palmer Drought Severity Index, which assigns positive  numbers when conditions are unusually wet for a particular region, and  negative numbers when conditions are unusually dry.
	
Click image to enlarge. Credit: NCAR. 								 							
  	“It’s really, really difficult to find a smoking gun, to find a climate  stress in a conflict and say definitively that in the absence of  climate stress this conflict wouldn’t have occurred,” he said in an  interview.
  	Levy said the study demonstrates where the social and physical science  communities are headed on the climate and conflict nexus, with more  researchers becoming convinced that the evidence is far stronger than it  was just a few years ago.
  	“Many more people are falling into the camp that the evidence is definitive,” Levy said.
  	Thomas Homer-Dixon, a professor at the University of Waterloo in  Canada, said the study presents a compelling case for a robust link  between climatic stress and violence, while being careful to acknowledge  that climate change is but one of many factors that can increase the  likelihood of violence.
  	“The paper’s conclusions are dramatic in terms of their implications  for policy and for humankind more generally, but they’re not  sensationally stated,” Homer-Dixon said in an email conversation.  “The  paper is well-caveated, with clear acknowledgments of areas where future  research is necessary.
  	“What does it all mean? The world will be a very violent place by  mid-century if climate change continues as projected. Climate change  will increase the likelihood that large zones of the world will see  central institutions disintegrate and evolve into a form of chronic  security anarchy — think Somalia, Yemen, western Pakistan, eastern  Congo, etc.”
  	Not everyone is convinced by the new research, however.  “I struggle to  see how the authors can claim a remarkable convergence of quantitative  evidence when one-third of their civil conflict models produce a climate  effect statistically indistinguishable from zero, and several other  models disagree on the direction of a possible climate effect,” said  Halvard Buhaug, research director at the 
Peace Research Institute in Oslo whose work has 
cast doubt on ties between climate extremes and conflict.
  	“Surprisingly, the authors provide no examples of real conflicts that  plausibly were affected by climate extremes that could serve to validate  their conclusion. For these and other reasons, this study fails to  provide new insight into how and under what conditions climate might  affect violent conflict,” he said in an email conversation.
  	The new study is what is known as a “meta analysis,” and it took the  data from numerous prior studies and examined them collectively using  state of the art statistical methods that were unavailable to  researchers until relatively recently, thereby drawing conclusions from a  far larger dataset than the individual studies themselves.
  	In total, the research contains the results of a comprehensive review  of the available data put forward by 60 prior studies of climate from  190 researchers in various disciplines, including data on violence  dating from 10,000 B.C.E. to the present day, extending across all  regions of the globe. Reflecting the growth of research on this topic in  recent years, 78 percent of the studies were published since 2009.
  	The study incorporated findings from research on domestic violence,  street crime, rioting, civil war, all the way to the collapse of entire  civilizations.
  	To compare all the datasets from individual studies, the researchers  first standardized the information using a measure of normal climate  variability, known as the standard deviation unit. Miguel likened this  process to “converting weather variables into a common currency.”
  	Next, in order to reduce the margin of error, the researchers pooled  the standardized data together in a way that is similar to how a  political pollster might average a group of polls to accurately predict  the outcome of a presidential election, rather than relying on just one  or two polls to get a snapshot of the race.  These methods allowed the  researchers to analyze separate data sets that would otherwise make for  “apples to oranges” comparisons.
  	 								 									  										
 																			
	 
 									  										 																		A deserted drought-stricken village in Mauritania seen in 2011.
	Credit: United Nations Photo by John Isaac. 								 							
  	Among climate change-related factors, the study found that temperature  has a larger effect on violence, particularly intergroup violence, than  precipitation, although both clearly influence the odds of violence.
  	In order to prevent such a bleak future, researchers and policymakers  face a daunting task, since knowing that climate change affects violence  is not enough to create better early warning systems or develop  violence-prevention strategies.
  	“We can’t just stick with the status quo,” Miguel said. “Our study  suggests that if we stick with the status quo we’re going to have a lot  more violence.”
  	To devise successful strategies that reduce the risk of future  violence, scientists need to determine the causal pathways through which  climate influences conflict. For example, it could be through economic  factors, with a drought reducing farmers’ income and, at the same time,  increasing food prices that further stress society. Policymakers also  need to put in place tools to anticipate and prevent conflict.
  	“We’re in the same position that medical researchers were in during the  1930s: they could find clear statistical evidence that smoking tobacco  was a proximate cause of lung cancer, but they couldn’t explain why  until many years later. In the same way, we can show that climatic  events cause conflict, but we can’t yet say exactly why,” said lead  author Solomon Hsiang of Princeton University (now at U.C. Berkeley), in  a press release.
  	The evidence regarding the link between climate change and conflict is  solid enough to have motivated the U.S. national security establishment,  spurring research projects at the 
CIA, the 
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and other agencies.
  	The 
2010 Quadrennial Defense Review, and the 
2010 National Security Strategy  identified climate change as a threat to U.S. national security, in  part, because of its potential to foment political instability in  strategically important regions, such as the Middle East.
  	A 
CIA-funded study published in 2012 found that climate extremes, such as droughts and heat waves, are already exacerbating tensions in parts of the world.
  	A promising avenue for early warning systems may be through the use of  big data. Those approaches would combine various social indicators, such  as the average income of a country, with environmental monitoring data,  such as satellite imagery showing vegetation health, to detect areas at  higher risk of climate change-related violence.
  	Some of those efforts are already underway. A Pentagon-sponsored  research group that Columbia’s Levy is advising is trying to combine  social media data mining with remote sensing data from satellites and  other tools to identify potential pressures on social stability in the  so-called “megacities” of the world, with populations of greater than 10  million.
  	“I think we’re still in the early days of being able to take all these  potential technologies and turn them into reliable, actionable early  warning systems,” Levy said. “We’re much, much closer than we were five  years ago.”